Cable Modems in the Workplace :: Internet Cable Modem Essays

Cable Modems in the Workplace Until recently, small businesses could not afford T-1 service to connect to the network. The recent advent of cable modems has provided a cheaper alternative to this problem. Cable operators have primarily targeted consumers in their initial cable modem rollouts. Multiple System Operators (MSOs) are now selling higher priced broadband Internet services to the corporate customer. The question is, does cable modem technology provide the optimum service for a medium sized company that is dependent on the Internet for data computing and research? To answer this question, we have to evaluate the price, bandwidth, and reliability in the business network. One significant factor that separates cable modem technology from other telephone networks is its ability to share bandwidth on the network. This characteristic is both an advantage and disadvantage for cable modems. The advantage is that cable modem users have the ability to use as much bandwidth as possible when it is available. The disadvantage resides in network congestion. When the user needs the bandwidth for a large file download or upload, it is not guaranteed the bandwidth. Lack of guaranteed bandwidth and modem reliability is the biggest concern that most companies have with cable modems. Yes, it is cheap, but can it perform? In the past, the reliability rate was 50% to 60% because of improper equipment and technology. (Schuman, Now playing:, 1999) More recently, upgrades of the cable system has allowed close to 98% cable modem reliability. Reliability is also dependent upon the number of users the cable company has hooked up to the cable node. If too many users are connected to the same node, there will be degradation in throughput. The cable company claims 30 Mbps downstream data transfer, but sharing often makes it more like 1.5 Mbps. (ZDNET, Cable Modems:, 1999) The quality cable companies like TCI, mitigates the uneasiness about reliability and questionable throughput by providing guaranteed upstream bandwidth, and excellent technical support. The reliability and congestion issues all seem to be problems of the past with the current upgrad es and service quality improvements made by the cable company. The big advantage that attracts many businesses is the low monthly fees compared to T-1 lines. A traditional T-1 line will cost at least $1,000 per month, where as TCI cable company charges $249 per month for 256 Kbps upstream connection.

Magwitch’s feelings about dying

I am going to die. Going to die I am. I am to die going. Five flittering little words, whirling round and round my head. Death. The Grim Reaper, Lucifer, the Great Crow, the Black Cat, Anubis, the Pale Horseman. Humanity's greatest mystery, oldest fear, the Hourglass we all try to run away from, finally to be unmasked; I am no longer afraid. Suddenly, there is so much I want to say, so much I want to do, but in my sudden rush of adrenaline I am confined to these four walls, this hard, rough mattress, eyes fixed on the blank, white ceiling. I want to move, say something, let the world know that this is it, I'm through, I'm done†¦but then again, who will care? It hits me; what are we, foolish human beasts? Did we really think we could cut the marionette strings that link us to Time's fiddling hands? Is it possible, that we once believed we were safe from the sharp edges of the Fates' scissors? Surely we didn't, couldn't, once imagine that we would be prepared to die, that we would know when our ferry through Acheron would embark. No, surely not; before you know it, the obolus is stuffed down your throat and Charon's dark paddle begins to glide through the gloomy waters of the underworld. I repeat, I am not afraid, just mystified by the mists of the Unknown that follow behind the curtain. I can see it, flimsy little thing; a roughly cut, black silk sheet, full of whispers and buzzing voices. Who's there? Can I touch it? I'm going insane. No Magwitch, there is no curtain, there's just the blank white ceiling, get some sleep. I don't want to sleep! I want to go! I want to touch the curtain! What does it feel like? It looks so soft†¦ too soft. Something isn't right. It's not beautiful anymore, in fact, as you get closer to it, you can see it really isn't silk, they're dirty rags, intertwined in each other's filth†¦I don't want to pull this curtain anymore, I don't like it. Pip! Come back! Come back and tell me of my daughter! May I know more of her before I die that the mere fact that she is alive and the woman of your dreams! Please†¦the Lord won't be merciful to me! Please†¦don't leave me†¦ I am not ready for this, but I let it happen anyways; with one last sweeping action, the curtain engulfs me in its sea of black. I am going to die. I am dead.

Why Did Tyrannosaurus Rex Have Such Tiny Arms

Tyrannosaurus Rex may or may not have been the most fearsome dinosaur that ever lived (you can also make a good case for Allosaurus, Spinosaurus or Giganotosaurus), but however high it ranks on the all-time viciousness charts, this meat-eater had one of the smallest arm-to-body-mass ratios of the entire Mesozoic Era. For decades, paleontologist and biologists have debated how T. Rex used its arms, and whether a further 10 million or so years of evolution (assuming the K/T Extinction hadnt happened) might have caused them to disappear entirely, the way they have in modern snakes. The Arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex Were Tiny Only in Relative Terms Before exploring this issue further, it helps to define what we mean by tiny. Because the rest of T. Rex was so huge--adult specimens of this dinosaur measured about 40 feet from head to tail and weighed anywhere from 7 to 10 tons--its arms only seemed small in proportion to the rest of its body, and were still pretty impressive in their own right. In fact, T. Rexs arms were over three feet in length, and a recent analysis has shown that they may have been capable of bench-pressing over 400 pounds each. Pound for pound, this study concludes, T. Rexs arm muscles were over three times more powerful than those of an adult human! Theres also a fair degree of misunderstanding about the range of T. Rexs arm motion and the flexibility of this dinosaurs fingers. The arms of T. Rex were fairly limited in their scope--they could only swing across an angle of about 45 degrees, compared to a much wider range for smaller, more flexible theropod dinosaurs like Deinonychus--but then again, disproportionately small arms wouldnt require a wide angle of operation. And as far as we know, the two large fingers on each of T. Rexs hands (a third, the metacarpal, was truly vestigial in pretty much every sense) were more than capable of snatching live, wriggling prey and holding it tight. How Did T. Rex Use Its Tiny Arms? This leads us to the million-dollar question: given their unexpectedly wide range of functionality, combined with their limited size, how did T. Rex actually use its arms? There have been a few proposals over the years, all (or some) of which may be true: T. Rex males mainly used their arms and hands to grab onto females during mating (females still possessed these limbs, of course, presumably using them for the other purposes listed below). Given how little we currently know about dinosaur sex, this is an iffy proposition at best!T. Rex used its arms to lever itself off the ground if it happened to be knocked off its feet during battle, say, with an eager-not-to-be-eaten Triceratops (which can be a tough proposition if you weigh eight or nine tons), or if it slept in a prone position.T. Rex used its arms to clutch tightly onto squirming prey before it delivered a killer bite with its jaws. (This dinosaurs powerful arm muscles lend further credence to this idea, but once again, we cant adduce any direct fossil evidence for this behavior.) At this point you may be asking: how do we know if T. Rex used its arms at all? Well, nature tends to be very economical in its operation: its unlikely that the tiny arms of theropod dinosaurs would have persisted into the late Cretaceous period if these limbs didnt serve at least some useful purpose. (The most extreme example in this respect wasnt T. Rex, but the two-ton Carnotaurus, the arms, and hands of which were truly nubbin-like; even so, this dinosaur probably needed its stunted limbs to at least push itself off the ground if it happened to fall down.) In Nature, Structures That Seem to be Vestigial Often Arent When discussing the arms of T. Rex, its important to understand that the word vestigial is in the eyes of the beholder. A truly vestigial structure is one that served a purpose at some point far back in an animals family tree but was gradually reduced in size and functionality as an adaptive response to millions of years of evolutionary pressure. Perhaps the best example of truly vestigial structures are the remnants of five-toed feet that can be identified in the skeletons of snakes (which is how naturalists realized that snakes evolved from five-toed vertebrate ancestors). However, its also often the case that biologists (or paleontologists) describe a structure as vestigial simply because they havent figured out its purpose yet. For example, the appendix was long thought to be the classic human vestigial organ, until it was discovered that this tiny sac can reboot the bacterial colonies in our intestines after theyve been wiped out by disease or some other catastrophic event. (Presumably, this evolutionary advantage counterbalances the tendency of human appendixes to become infected, resulting in life-threatening appendicitis.) As with our appendixes, so with the arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex. The most likely explanation for T. Rexs oddly proportioned arms is that they were exactly as big as they needed to be. This fearsome dinosaur would quickly have gone extinct if it didnt have any arms at all -- either because it wouldnt be able to mate and produce baby T. Rexes, or it wouldnt be able to get back up if it fell to the ground, or it wouldnt be able to pick up small, quivering ornithopods and hold them into its chest close enough to bite off their heads!