Souring Relations essays

Souring Relations essays In the years between 1754 and 1774 the relationship between the American colonies and Great Britain soured tremendously. These tensions were caused by an onslaught of events that kept separating the colonies from Britain. Some of these events were the Stamp Act, the Quartering act of1765, the Currency Act of 1764, and the rejection of the Albany plan. Extensive documentation related to the events and American propaganda against Britain expose how Britain's extensive abuse of the colonies led to the hostilities of the American Revolution. The Stamp Act, which was a tax on all documents processed by the colonial government in order to help pay for the expenses of defense was a major cause of discontent of Americans towards Britain. Document G states that the stamp act was supposed to require any citizen to pay three pence on any parchment, piece of paper, declaration, or any copy thereof, passed through in any court of law in the American colonies. The image in Document H uses a skull and crossed bones, which synonymous of bad and evil, to depict the distraught the Stamp Act. The editors of the image believed that the Stamp Act was a threat to their liberties. Document I is a formal response from the Stamp Act Congress to Parliament stating that it was the American's opinion that this act was not respecting their essential rights and liberties. In this document the congress outlines the privileges, they had by being colonial subject of them. The document specifically mentioned, the right to trial by jury, the f act they were not represented in the House of Commons, and that Englishmen should not be taxed without their own consent among others. The Stamp Act Riots in New York in 1765 examined in Document J. These riots were a prime of example of the distraught the Stamp Act caused. The document states that about 5000 people of New York attended the burning of the stamps. Although the Stamp Act was important in the divergenc...

Free sample - Appeasement and the Munich. translation missing

Appeasement and the Munich. Appeasement and the Munich1. How did Chamberlain defend the Munich Agreement? What was he trying to achieve? After tension continued to rise in European continent, because of the speech that was delivered at a Nuremberg by Herr Hitler, the ministers started to examine the tension of the whole situation in the light of this speech. They tried to maintain the state of peace at all possible means. The aim of this speech was the fact that Hitler wanted to attack Czechoslovakia and further continues to attack the upper east. Nevertheless, Hitler knew that it would be hard to conquer and he had to do this as fast as possible before France and the Great Britain could have taken effect. Chamberlain after discovering the acts that Hitler was planning he identified himself with the circumstances and after considering the possibility over the sudden and dramatic step that would have saved the situation he decided that he should inform Hitler that he should go to Germany and see him so that he could calm the situation. After the preparation, he thought that it was better if he persuaded Hitler that â⠂¬Å"Hitler had an unequalled opportunity of raising his own prestige and fulfilling what he has so often declared to be his aim, namely the establishment of an Anglo-German understanding, preceded by a settlement of the Czechoslovakian question† and that he shouldn’t guarantee that â€Å"Dr. Benes would accept this solution, but I should undertake to put all possible pressure on him to do so. 2. What alternatives did Churchill offer to the Munich Agreement? How realistic were these alternatives? On the other hand, Churchill contributed a lot to the Munich agreement despite facing a motion of no confidence Churchill continued to provide a very strong leadership even though the war continued to go bad for the Britain and a couple of defeats. However he continued facing critics because of mending in the military matters and the fact that he continued to be advised by some of his friends rather than his own military commanders. It is said that one of the major contributions that he accomplished was, â€Å"his ability to inspire the British people to greater effort by making public broadcasts on significant occasions†. It is reported that he was a very brilliant orator and a very tireless source of all the sufferings of the blitz. More so played the part of the creation of Bolshevism that actually brought about the formation of Russian revolution which was an n international part of the atheistic Jewish. However, Clynes sates that Churchill â€Å"was and has always remain ed, a soldier in mufti. He possesses inborn militaristic qualities, and is intensely proud of his descent from Marlborough. He cannot visualize Britain without an Empire, or the Empire without wars of acquisition and defense. A hundred years ago he might profoundly have affected the shaping of our country's history. Now, the impulses of peace and internationalism, and the education and equality of the working classes, leave him unmoved†. This shows the character that Churchill posed and the fact that he was a man of the people. 3. Does awareness of this history change your assessment of the Munich Agreement? If so, how and why? At the end of 1918, cultural German delegates from Bohemia and Moravia discarded enclosure in Czechoslovakia and as a substitute declared the combination of German-majority expanse (such as the Sudetenland) with Austria. In response, the new Czech government mobilized its army to enforce its boundaries- even though these boundaries contained over three million ethnic Germans. This awareness did change the Munich agreement because each country learnt to live by its own and protect its people and its country. In the note, this aspect Munich agreement separated most Germans and thus the countries separated from one another in fear of war arising amongst them.